Here is some information that might be useful for development:
I have a MediaWiki installation which I serve via Apache, all running on Linux. I intend to use Prince 8.0 to convert several hundred pages to one PDF file, accessing the pages all via "http://localhost/wiki/index.php5/Page_Title". The static 64-bit binary of Prince reports "error: The requested URL returned error: 400" and Apache's error_log contains messages of the form "error reading the headers, referer: xe8\x87\xe0\b\x18{\x02". I also observed that the Apache error_log messages sometimes contain weird substrings of some of my page names. Reducing the number of pages to download changes the subset of pages where that error occurs (it's stable, otherwise) but then Prince seems to get stuck and eats up all available memory (strace shows that it calls brk all the time).
Eventually I discovered that the dynamic 64-bit binaries runs absolutely flawlessly on a machine running Debian 6.0.3.
This suggests that the problem is in one or some of the library versions linked into the static binaries. Maybe, the stability could be enhanced by linking the static binaries on a Debian 6.0.3 system? (Oh, and yes, I do volunteer as a tester, even though that particular problem is now solved for me.)
I have a MediaWiki installation which I serve via Apache, all running on Linux. I intend to use Prince 8.0 to convert several hundred pages to one PDF file, accessing the pages all via "http://localhost/wiki/index.php5/Page_Title". The static 64-bit binary of Prince reports "error: The requested URL returned error: 400" and Apache's error_log contains messages of the form "error reading the headers, referer: xe8\x87\xe0\b\x18{\x02". I also observed that the Apache error_log messages sometimes contain weird substrings of some of my page names. Reducing the number of pages to download changes the subset of pages where that error occurs (it's stable, otherwise) but then Prince seems to get stuck and eats up all available memory (strace shows that it calls brk all the time).
Eventually I discovered that the dynamic 64-bit binaries runs absolutely flawlessly on a machine running Debian 6.0.3.
This suggests that the problem is in one or some of the library versions linked into the static binaries. Maybe, the stability could be enhanced by linking the static binaries on a Debian 6.0.3 system? (Oh, and yes, I do volunteer as a tester, even though that particular problem is now solved for me.)